Return to CrashPlan

February 22, 2012 under Computer

After five and half long years of using Carbonite, I have switched over my cloud-based to CrashPlan.  This has been something that has been lingering for awhile but a recent hardware event forced the issue.

In another post, I describe my backup strategy.  Even though, my strategy had multiple layers, it still failed a little bit.  My main data drive on my main computer got corrupted.  No big deal, I thought.  It is under warranty, and I will RMA the old and get a new one.  After that, I will just pull down the last good image from WHS.  However, it was that smooth.

No matter how hard I tried, I couldn’t do a volume restore.  It just kept failing a certain points.  So next I tried to mount the WHS “Z Drive” and just copy the files over.  That mostly worked.  However, a whole much of family movies that I had ripped from DV tape would not restore.  Kept getting a “The drive cannot find the sector requested.”  I did the usual chkdsk’s and repair backup history but no change.  I truly this is related to a external USB harddrive failure a few months ago and WHS really never cleaned up after itself.  It never “re” backed up the data it lost because of the USB harddrive failure on the WHS server.

So next I tried Carbonite…no luck at all.  Carbonite, by default, will never backup a video file.  I realize that you can turn this on for a specific folder but at the end of the day, it is a horrible issue.  These were never setup to be backed up because of their file extension. 

In addition, I really doubt that Carbonite would have ever uploaded those files.  It was so far behind.  Carbonite has a “feature” that severely limits bandwidth after you have uploaded so many gig’s.  It is a way for them to “manage” their “unlimited” plan.  However, it makes it useless after 200 gig’s.

After researching all of the main backup providers, I chose CrashPlan.  I had used CrashPlan before…strictly in a peer-to-peer mode.  However,it became such a lopsided relationship that it wasn’t worth it anymore.  When a computer is a backup target, all of the data needs to be able to fit a single backup volume.  I could quickly outgrow that.  They have had the CrashPlan Central for awhile but their pricing never really interested me until know.

image

The beauty of it was up to 10 computers for the same price.  And the key features that are priceless:  any file type and no limits: storage or bandwidth.

comments: 0 » tags: , ,

Proxy Unsupported Printers

February 21, 2011 under Computer, Driver, Printer, Windows7

I have an older LaserJet 1000 that HP has sunsetted.  It is our workhorse at home for everyday printing.  It is a host based printer…meaning it needs to be attached a computer to spool and print.  We have its USB cable plugged into our Windows Home Server as a shared network device.  My wife got a new 64bit PC, Windows7.  I was shocked when I realized that she couldn’t connect.  No 64 bit drivers are available.

As an alternative, I installed a shared PDF printer on our WHS.

  1. Install PDFCreator on the workstation/server that is still supported by your printer.  Make sure you select “Server” when you install.
  2. Run PDFCreator Options
  3. Turn on AutoSave
    image
    I specified a temp directory that was UNC because this was on a WHS.
  4. Turn on AutoPrint
    image
  5. Under Printers, Share the PDF Printer
    image
    I renamed it to be the model that I was proxying.  Also, make sure to include x64 bit drivers.
  6. From the new unsupported workstation, add the new PDF Printer that was shared.

 

Every so often, you might need to delete out the temp PDF’s that it creates.  You will lose some options that are printer specific but it general it works perfectly.

comments: 0 » tags: ,

Call for Backup

February 19, 2011 under Computer

Over the years, our digital life represents more and more of our real life.  Whether documents, financials, music or pictures, we have an enormous amount of personal data on our computers that cannot be replaced or lost. 

In the last couple weeks, I have first hand experience data loss.  I lost my main data hard drive about 700 GB of data (not the system drive).  My sister lost her hard drive to our desktop computer. That hard drive contained not only the OS but also all of her documents and pictures.  Fortunately, the net result is that we had no data loss.  I have lost data before and it made me feel ill.  Never again.  In the last month, it was a good fire drill on our backup strategy.

First off, there are different types of failures.  I like to refer to these as different scopes of disasters.  

Scope Reason  
A few files or folders
  • Human Error
  • Corrupt files
I refer to this as the “Whoops” scenario.  How many times have you done a “File—>Save” vs. a “File—>Save As”?   Overwrite & delete are the most common culprits.  Sometimes, it could be as innocent as editing a picture and overwriting the original.  In the end, it usually just our own fault.
Entire hard drive or computer
  • Hardware failure
  • Virus
This situation seems to occur the most often in life.  Just last month, a hard drive failed.  I bet I have worn out at least 10 hard drives in my life.
Entire house
  • Lightening Strike
  • Natural Disaster
  • Fire
The most unplanned for situation.

 

A good comprehensive backup strategy will keep all 3 of these in mind,  In general, no solution fits all situations and none of them are bullet proof.  Each of them has a cost associated with it…whether time, money, bandwidth or discipline.  I personally use a combination of solutions for my needs.  Your mileage may vary. 

Windows Home Server

Hands down this is one of the best products for backing up Windows desktops and laptops.  Microsoft already put in all of the intelligence of what to backup.  It knows that you don’t need a backup of your Internet Explorer cache or other temp files.  It also keeps a single copy of the same file found in multiple directories or computers.  It backups the entire computer, including programs and operating system.  You can boot from a CD and restore a hard drive in an hour or two with little effort…perfect for a crashed hard drive.  I have personally replaced broken hard drives this way twice in the last year or so.  I have also used the disk restore one other time to revert the system drive to a previous state after installing some software I didn’t really care for.   You can restore individual files and folders to previous point in time.  This is done via Explorer like approach and is intuitive enough.  I wish they would have wired up “Previous Versions” in the desktop’s Explorer.

I have all my computers backing up to this.  In addition, my in-law’s computers also backup to this.  I brought their computer over to my house and did the initial backup.  Subsequent backups are done via Hamachi.  WHS is only good for “local computers”.  At least they have be local for initial backup and any restores.

The good:  cheap…you can build your own frankenstein server or buy an OEM.  I got my Acer for $300 plus the cost of some extra harddrives.  Simple to use.  Just works and is rock solid.

The bad:  doesn’t cover the whole house disaster.  If I had a major lightning strike or EMP go off at my house, this would not save me.  There are some plugin’s to do some backup to the cloud but you have be really selective about what gets sent because of network bandwidth and cloud storage fees.

Scope:  operates very well on restoring a PC to any given point in time. Restoring individual files is decent, as well.

This is my primary backup component and has not failed me.

Carbonite

Use a cloud based backup service such as Carbonite, Mozy & Amazon S3.  This is a growing market and many more competitors are out there since I last reviewed them.  I personally use Carbonite and have used them for years.  They offer unlimited backup storage for a fixed rate.  Carbonite has very simple program that just works.  It is totally perfect for grandma and grandpa.

Carbonite is not a comprehensive solution.  It works well to selectively solve the offsite backup gap.  Unfortunately, it’s not very practical for my TB’s of data that need to be backed up.  It backs up “precious” data for me. 

I had installed it on sister’s computer.  After she got her new hard drive and did the system restore, we installed Carbonite.  It walked her through the restore.  It took almost 2 weeks to get it all back.  Biggest issue was we had to turn off the power saver features on her computer; otherwise, the restore would effectively only happen when she was in front of her computer.  After that was adjusted, it still took several days to do the restore.  It is simple math.  It takes a long time to download 100 gig or so.  It restored all of the user data except for video files, including some home videos.  Overall, it did exactly what we wanted it to do at a time that we never wanted to happen.

The good:  it just works.  Very simple UI and is approved for even novice user.   It uses incremental backups which is a phenomenal bandwidth savings when you dealing with a 2gig PST file.  Also, no discipline is necessary other than paying the bill.

The bad:  it takes a long time to get it back but an even longer time to get it up there.  Carbonite is unlimited but storing your 200 gig music collection at most services would be cost prohibitive.  Also, not all files are backed up (e.g. movies).

Scope:  Works well for entire house disasters because it is offsite.  Also, good for restoring a few files…Carbonite keeps versions.

Windows Live Mesh

Distribute enough copies such that all of them can’t be destroyed at once was my primary backup strategy for years.  I had even wrote a Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS) client that would upload my files safely offsite.  It was way cooler than FTP but had about the same value.  BITS was really good for slow bandwidth and restartability. 

Today, Windows Live Mesh fills this need.  I started using FolderShare, then Live Sync and now we are stuck with Mesh.  I use this in my family to share our picture libraries  It takes a while but it will eventually get there.  This fits a functional need (sharing) as well as backup.  However, a delete is quickly replicated!  This option saved my sister’s home videos that Carbonite ignored.  It don’t mind sharing your files unencrypted, this is a good choice. 

The good:  free and just kinda works

The bad:  Slow, unencrypted, no versioning, etc.  One big draw back to Mesh right now is that you cannot share your files readonly any more. 

Scope:  really good for entire house issues (offsite)

Shadow Copies

Certain builds of Windows have previous versions  built in.  The OS takes shadow copies of the hard drive typically twice a day.  It is really easy to get back to a previous state when the occasional whoops occurs between backups.  However, this is a backup convenience not a strategy.

Robocopy

I robocopy all of my “precious” data frequently (typically daily) to another computer (or could be a USB hard drive).  This is just my OCD cropping up.  This shouldn’t be necessary but it makes me feel good.  The net is a have exact copies elsewhere in my house.  Some people talk about taking a USB hard drive to work or a family member’s house to get it offsite but I have never been that disciplined.

comments: 0 » tags: , , ,

I could be a sniper

February 10, 2011 under Computer

Reading a little about my colorblindness, I read a really interesting tidbit on http://vischeck.com/info/wade.php

On the positive side, there is some evidence that colour-blind people are much better than average at certain jobs. They are very good at finding green things hidden against green backgrounds – for example grass or leaves. They tend to find things by shape and get less confused by camouflage. Because of this, colour-blind entomologists still catch lots of bugs and in wartime, armies prize their colour-blind snipers and spotters. So, if you are colour blind and have trouble picking strawberries, why not try your hand at green beans or peas instead? You might be surprised at how well you do!

What else is really interesting about this site is their image/website check.  It will simulate a colorblind person’s experience.  5% of men have this in some form…a population that shouldn’t be forgotten.

comments: 0 » tags:

AOE Scanner

May 18, 2007 under Vista

When trying to install my Visioneer 9120 Scanner, I got this weird error:

 

 

comments: 2 »

Canon CR2 Codec Memory Leak

May 17, 2007 under Photography, Vista

Running Vista, I have installed the Canon provided RAW codec for CR2 format.  It allows you view those files natively. 

I was browsing through a folder of pictures.  I noticed that it got slower and slower as I went through the pages.  Eventually, it gave me an out of memory error.  I didn’t have anything else open.  I brought up Task Manager and saw that I had memory left.  I closed the picture viewer and just watched the memory get reclaimed in about 20 seconds.  The total delta there is about 1.5 gig.

 

comments: 0 »

Lightroom import fails in Vista

May 17, 2007 under Lightroom, Photography, Vista

I tried to import pictures for the first time in Lightroom on my new Vista machine.

 

I kept on getting the mysterious:

"Problem with Importing Files - the file was not imported. Could not copy a file to the requested location."

 

At first I thought it was my card reader.  I got a brand new, built in one.  But I was able to read the files directly.  So I tried copying the files to my desktop and importing them from there.  I got the same error.

I double checked the file permissions of the target and they were all fine.  I also tried not applying any Metadata templates or “Rendering Standard-Sized Previews.”   Same result.

Normally, I organize the imported pictures with the following options:

 

I went ahead and changed to:

 

surprisingly that worked! However, that is frustrating because I like to auto create a separate folder for each day based upon date taken.

 

After looking around on Adobe’s website, I found the following:

 

http://www.adobe.com/go/kb401508

If the By Date path you select for your folder in the Import Photos dialog box contains a forward slash, then your photos are not imported.

 

So it is a Lightroom bug with Vista.  I changed the option to:

 

That will work fine.  I can then rearrange after import.  I really want an option that makes it YYYY/MM/YYYY-MM-DD/.  For now, I will manually create that structure. 

One thing that is weird:  this is one of the few “template” things that you cannot edit in the application settings folder for Lightroom.

comments: 0 »

Every DAM thing sucks

DAM as in Digital Asset Management.  One of my hobbies that I have had great interest in since high school has been photography.  I have always enjoyed the whole experience:  taking pictures, developing, printing and sharing.  In fact, I really wanted to create my own darkroom in my house just before digital photography became available.

I have been evaluating the following products for quite some time:

Others that I have researched but did not try were the following:

 

It is truly amazing how some of the products do a few things very nice but fall short in some other aspect that makes it very frustrating. 

Some of the key things that I looked at were:

  • Ease of use
  • UI–Is it clunky?  It is elegant and simple?  Is is overwhelming?
  • Speed–Do I need water cooling or a 486?
  • Extensibility–Can you script?  Does it support plugins? 
  • How well does it play with others?–Does it use standard IPTC or EXIF?  Does have a proprietary format or backend database?  Where does it store its data?
  • Tagging and Organization:  Does it support hierarchical tagging?  What about GEO Tagging? 
  • Offline Capabilities
  • Unwanted upselling?  Does “encourage” you to use their vendor for printing or web hosting of the pictures?
  • Does it support RAW?
  • Workflow:  Does it support multiuser?  how do you import the pictures?
  • Cost

Some of the things that were really low on my list were:

  • Photo editing
  • CD/DVD editing
  • Picture sharing

I will starting posting a writeup on these.

comments: 0 »

Interesting Carbonite log

September 13, 2006 under Computer

Decided to try out Carbonite based on Omar’s recommendation.  Seems like a great program & cheap.

I was looking around in the log (C:Program FilesCarboniteCarbonite BackupdataCarbonite.log).  There are a lot of interesting messages and metrics there.  The funniest one that I saw was this:

“BackupThread: Backup for backup changes delayed due to backup delay.”

Not sure if it is an obvious statement or conflicting…still pondering.

comments: 1 » tags:

ActionPack launched

August 28, 2006 under Computer

ActionPack–A very Rail-ish DAL generator for .NET has been released on CodePlex.  It is definitely one of the cooling things I have seen in the code-generation world.  One thing that stands out about it is that no actually code is generated…just the binaries.  It relies on the 2.0 framework. 

I know one of the most painful gaps of bridging .NET and SQL is nullable types.  I am currently using the Nullable Types project on SourceForge with a few customizations.  I will be interested how this addresses null values.

comments: 0 »